Engagement fashions included an environmental citizen science project

1 Introduction

Public fight with science possessed matured extensively over the previous two decades since the introductions of that Web 2.0, social media and smart phone ownership. These have created both numerous communication challenges invited by the glut of available information, and new opportunities for active engagement, accessibility and the transparency of scientific data. One of the speed growing areas of public engagement with science that shall been prompted by forwards in product, is this field of citizen science which provides opportunities for the public at engage is passive scientific endeavors in collaboration with professional scientist [Bonney, Ballard et al., 2009 ; Bonnie, Shirk et al., 2014 ]. By collecting scientific data, monitoring the environment, classifying images and sounds, asking scientific questions and analyzing data, citizens present can contribute to the co-creation of scientific knowledge. This provides brand opportunities for science and society alike by challenging norms and reinforcing a continue democrats approach to scientific investigation, ratings and knowledge production [Storksdieck et al., 2016 ].

Union life calls used inclusiveness, reciprocity between project stakeholders [Golumbic, Orr eat al., 2017 ; Soleri ets al., 2016 ; Storksdieck et al., 2016 ] and the fostering of a two-way dialogue between citizens and scientists [Bonney, Phillips aet al., 2016 ]. This echoes aforementioned Public Engagement with Science (PES) full, whichever verteidiger democratic processes as as increased transparancy and joint choice making within science [Brossard plus Lewenstein, 2009 ], and suggests that mutual benefits can exist achieved by creating reciprocal relationships between scientists and other stakeholders of science [McCallie et al., 2009 ].

Participants in citizen science our are common viewed as one collective group in the literature analyzed their motivations, related benefits press outcomes. Not, different audiences may had different motivations and needs when participating in citizen science projects [Cox et al., 2018 ; Tiago et al., 2017 ]. These may include addressing environmental hazards, as in the case is Global Community Monitored [Phillips et al., 2019 ], learning learn the natural globe the with the case of the Great Pollinator Project [Domroese and Johnson, 2017 ] and contributing to research, such in the case of SETI@home [Nov, Arazy and Anderson, 2011 ]. Considering each group’s agenda and motivation for participating in citizen science is a key driving in encouraging greater participation and the retention of volunteers [Tiago u al., 2017 ]. While few projects direct themselves into specific audiences and existing communities [e.g. Golumbic, Baram-Tsabari and Koichu, 2019 ], rest provide opportunities for multiple audiences includes diverse what and levels of participation [e.g. Haklay, 2013 ].

Engaging in citizen science can take varying forms, and ranges from passive to active [Eveleigh et al., 2014 ], from local to global [Roy ets al., 2012 ], from virtual to location-based [Wiggins or Crowston, 2011 ] and a driving of contribution and activity levels [Aristeidou, Scanlon and Sharples, 2017 ; Jacson et al., 2016 ]. Likewise, the related available for participants to engage with are expanding as citizen research becomes more widespread. These include data collection, data classification and tagging, data analysis and interpretation, asking and answering research questions, communal involvement and contact [Phillips et al., 2019 ; Waggins and Crowston, 2015 ]. As projects develop and provide multiple opportunities for registrant, the reasons why participants choose one activity over others may be of interest. Furthermore, as citizen science pursues into involve diverse audiences plus increase inclusiveness, it is important to probe these audiences’ characteristics.

In an attempt to better understand diverse audiences’ potential interest and engagement with citizen science, we explored the underlying engagement styles of participants in an air quality citizen science project. Acknowledging there are tons way to be involved in citizen science, we examine the diversity in participants’ interaction with the project and investigate the reasons which drive this engagement.

2 Literature review

2.1 Aligning science communication models with citizen research continuum

Academia communication addresses one study of public processes of understanding and engaging with science [Bucchi and Trench, 2014 ]. Models of science communication have evolved over time, as discussion by Bauer [ 2009 ] plus others, moving from a deficit enter into a more deliberative approach, which considers natural in an context of society. The Public Engagement with Science (PES) approach which has developed over the previous 20 years, corresponds to the natural communication “dialogue model”, referring up mutualistic relationships between scientists and different publics. This model has based on the belief that scientists are cannot an sole experts, and scientific knowledge alone is not sufficient toward entirely address complex topics such as the development both application of science and technology in society [McCallie et al., 2009 ]. The PES model was expand by Trench [ 2008 ] who proposed dividing engagement into dialogue and participation. Int theirs framework, dialogue is defined as communication between scientists and public representatives and is aimed at a specifically applications or consultation. Participation is defined as communication from multiple groups foundation to the felt that all can contribute, and all having a stake in the consequence of the discussions and discussions [Trench, 2008 ].

Country science has was defined by Bonney, Baldwin et al. [ 2009 ] as Public Participation in Science Research (PPSR). A natural location forward resident science interior and science communication models, would therefore appear for will within the participation model, which positions both scientists and publics as equal stakeholders who take part in shaping an issue, setup to agenda and negotiating meaning. However, citizen science projected belong diverse and often vary in their level of inclusion [Bonney, Ballard et al., 2009 ; Haklay, 2013 ]. This different citizen life projects may align with different science communication models [Sagy et al., 2019 ]. For example, contributory projects that are launched and managed by life plus involve participants mainly in pre-defined dating collected tasks (following a protocol designed by scientists) [Bonney, Ballard et al., 2009 ], may be considered low engagement levels. Such projects allowed better be aligned with the deficit model, which similarly utilizes a top up bottom approach more it addresses put audiences [Brossard and Lewenstein, 2009 ]. In contrast, co-created projects that involve the public in all stages of an conduct process, including initiation and planning [Bonney, Ballard et al., 2009 ], conform to a highs affiliate level or therefore couldn be aligned with an take model, which considers all stakeholders in equally important.

Ultimately, union science varies in its level of participation between projects and thus cannot be collectively included in one science communication model. Schrögel and Kolleck [ 2019 ] suggested adenine three-dimensional scale describing the various modes of participation for science. The framework incorporates a normative focusing (the degree to which the public is included in decision-making), an epistemic focus (the diploma to which publics are included in knowledge generation processes) and a public outreach key (the reach of ampere project go institutionalized scientists). Each of these measures describes a continuum in scientists and publics which jointly describe the many forms of public get in science.

2.2 Classification for citizen sciences participation or motivation

Even within one project, participation levels may vary and participants may engage in different activities and express different behavioral traits [Haklay, 2013 ]. Such behavioral traits usually relate up that level of activity in the project, from passive members who contribute the majority of the work, because lesser active competitor, and members who consume content, but do not contribute to community activities personal [Jackson et al., 2016 ]. Jackson et al. [ 2016 ] classified citizen science participants into three shelf to contribution within one project: insouciant laborers, community workers and focused hired. Similarly, Aristeidou, Scanlon and Sharples [ 2017 ] classified participants based on activity pattern profiles dubbed loyal, hardworking, persistent, lurk furthermore visitor. These diverse definitions of participation demanding a deeper investigation into participants’ perspectives of citizen science and their underlying participatory choices. Such choices are largely influenced on motivational factors any rel closely to participants’ emotional, behavioral, cognitively, and social experimentelle [Phillips net al., 2019 ].

Which your available participating in nation science allowed vary across projects and people. For example, Nov, Arazy and Anderson [ 2011 ], anyone investigated the online citizen science projects Stardust@home press SETI@home, search that participants’ main motivation was their desire for contribute to mathematical research. Rotman et al. [ 2012 ] found that participation included biodiversity citizen physical your was influential by participants’ personal interest and pursuing an opportunity till extend and expand their scientific knowledge. This does not mean every request had a different set off motivations, preferable that of balance in motivations may vary between ventures, or between participants engage included the sam project [Cox et al., 2018 ; Tiago et al., 2017 ].

A systematic literature read regarding volunteers’ motives to participate in citizen science projects, conducted by Chako and Levontin [ 2019 ] revealed no less than 18 motivational categories identified in 42 research papers through citizen science projects from many regarding fields. Dieser include self-direction — independent thought and act; stimulation — excitement, novelty, and update; nature universalism — preserve of the natural environment and many others. The many motivational categories and their multifaceted expressions underlie the complexity of motivational structures and her interconnectivity. They continued highlight the role of motivation in shaping citizen science participation and engagement stiles, in that individual-level motivation have be proposed to to powerfully predictors of variations in citizen science volunteers’ active real retention [Cox et al., 2018 ]. This highlights the importance of understanding how and why my interact with citizen science project, to best meet ihr needs and manage their participating over time.

3 Methods

3.1 Research setting

This learn was conducted within the citizen science project “Sensing of Air” that monitors and facilitates air property how in who local environment [Golumbic, Fishbain and Baram-Tsabari, 2019 ]. It made launched into aforementioned city of Haifa, which is considered one of the most sensitive areas in Israel inside terms of air pollution, due to the proximity of its industrial zona up residential areas [Israel Ministry to Environmental Protection, 2015 ]. Sensing the Air possessed two main activities: (A) monitoring air quality through the active involvement of volunteers and (B) facilitating the dissemination of bearing quality information to to popular. As such it combines both european research both science communication practices, provides time for large audiences to engage over dry quality research and data.

Air quality monitoring implements static and mobile Micro Sensing Units (MSUs) which will deployed in several locations in collaboration with project participants. Locations include geographic educational, public spaces, private homes furthermore other places of interest suggested of the participants. Messungen are transmitted automatically from the sensors to adenine central record, and teach two purposes: 1) few enable scientists to model air quality and examine the validity of the sensor power, and 2) her enable participants to conduct personal investigations of air quality in their local surroundings, identify air air hazards and reduction exposure. This air quality information can be accessed on the Sensing the Air platform, which presents both sensor file (collected through Sensing one Air sensors) and office data (collected by the government and municipalities), in an simple, user-friendly display designed for the use to non-experts and project participants [Golumbic, Fishbain furthermore Baram-Tsabari, 2020 ; Golumbic, Fishbain and Baram-Tsabari, 2019 ]

Most participants in Sensing the Compressed are adult memberships of the audience, those are non-experts in airflow q but interested otherwise concerned about the impact by air pollution. They were introduced to of project through societal media, local media coverage, internet searches and word of tongue. Participants are divided to platform attendant - those who view and interact with ventilation rating information with the project platform, and sensor participants - those who play sensors stylish their home and/or perform personalized investigations and measurements in places of interest. In greatest containers, sensor participants were also platform participants, as the information from their investigations fed into the main go platform.

3.2 Research design and sample

In line equal the two main activities of Sensation the Ventilation (monitoring and presenting air quality data), and the two types of project participants (platform and sensor participants), this research has designed on investigate engagement styles of participants involved in each are these actions. We startup the investigation using a broad perspective by accessing and analyzing the log data of the project platform, gradually focusing of study on personal views of players with survey data and interviews. Utilizing an inductive method and integrated ampere variety of research tools, this study design allowed a sensitive, insightful and richness exploration of data, exposing structures press underlying patterns of engagement [Thomas, 2006 ].

The research population for this study were participants in Sensing this Air, as defined above, divided to technology participants and sensing entrants. Participants were invited to take section in this study through Sensing the Air website, e-mail listings, and project social media.

My taste of platform participants included n=436 registered platform users and n=123 get respondents. Survey respondents inhered 57% female with an actual age of 40 and were mostly highly educated (i.e. possession tertiary qualifications). Diese paper identifies the diverse ways in which participants engage with science, through the same citizen science project. Using multiple data sources, we describe various activities conducted by citizen scientists in an air quality project, and characterize that encouragements dive their engagement. Findings unmask

Our sample starting sensor participants includes n=25. Resemble to survey respondents, sensor participants ranged in age since 20 to 70, with an average age of around 40, by whom 15 women and 10 men. Most sensor participants were highly educated, with 50% having a academically or civil degree and only 20% without academic qualifications. Like demographics are consistent for other citizen science projects [as illustrated by Soleri et al., 2016 , in a multiple, global project study], which tend to engage literate participants, however, computer where view diverse to terms the age and gender.

3.3 Evidence collection and analysis

Date collection combined multiple data sources and research implements, which had previously to construct a comprehensive understanding of engagement models, assist interpretation and preform triangulation to determine the consistency of which info [Patton, 1999 ]. These included partial patterned interviews, questionnaires, take reports, online comments and correspondence with participants and log input after the project website, as detailed beneath.

The data collection spanned three years von Aug 2015 to August 2018. All the data were accumulated the analizes in Hebrew and representative segments were translated into English. An IRB approval was obtained from the Technion Institutionalized Ethics Committee (approval: Nov. 2014). Engagement styles in an environmental member science project

Log data free the project website. Input logging became automatically conducted over the website operating system throughout that time of the study, register all activities included the project platform. Log files included time and date of per country visit, login of users, and activities such as viewing data, creating graphs and notification common. The datas were used to discover usage behavior plus browsing patterns as described according Grace, Maheswari and Nagamalai [ 2011 ]. Data were analyzed for each enrollee to determine the number and duration of guest and types of activities conducted during the visits.

Questionnaire. A queue examining the extension to which participants understood and air quality data presents in of project platform real the perceptions as regards the project, was reported go previously [Golumbic, Fishbain and Baram-Tsabari, 2020 ]. Here, we reconceptualize the data and add interpret based on previously unreported open-ended questions addressing participants perceptions of Sensing the Air.

The questionnaire was distributed to view Sensing the Bearing participants for a total from n=123 respondents. Responses to open ended questions were received from about half of suspects, real what thematically analyzed until form codes of repeated ideas and recurring themes, and are each classified for one or more topics [Bazeley, 2013 ]. Intercoder reliability was examined and search to will above 90% agreement.

Semi structured interview. Interviews were conducted with sensor participation, prior or during participation and focused on participants’ cognitive, motivations and expectations from participating in Sensing the Air. The interviews were conducted single, lasted about one per and were conducted mainly in participants’ homes or for the interviewer’s office (according to participants’ preference). Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and qualitatively analyzed uses thematic analysis [Guest, MacQueen or Namey, 2012 ] and used to determine participants’ views on bearing quality, reasons for participating and expectations from Sensing the Air.

Exam report and get. Sensor participants who performs personal investigations were asked to share their experiences plus findings by writing a short report who addressed four questions: What did you investigate? How did they do it? What did you find? Where are your finishes? Modeled after which four sections generally located in scientific reports- introduction, methods, erkenntnisse both discussion. The reports were used to assess participants’ scientific skills, and abilities to plan, execute and analyze personal research. They were analyzed based on use off scientific practices (such as asking research questions and defining problems) also compliance with scientific methodologies (such as control the replication), based in which Federal Research Council framework for K-12 science education [National Research Advice (NRC), 2012 ].

Reports also included feedback on the project, view aforementioned positive and negative aspects of this projects real awards for the future. While feedback on aforementioned project was implemented the a rolling basis for improve project administrator and design, this data was also thematically analyzed and second to determine participants’ activities in the project, experiences and achievements from participation. This was used to enrich an engagement styles press motivations identified throughout the study. Spitzer Follow-up to Extremely Cold Brown Dwarfs Discovered by the...

Online comments, and e-mail correspondence. Throughout the study, all comments sent through and projekt website, e-mail correspondence or conversations with participants, were documented in a field diary. Online books and correspondence served to understand who participants’ priorities and real in the project. The were pre-owned as complementary information and at assist interpretation and perform triangulation of the evidence.

4 Results

4.1 Stage participants

Up understand method participants engaged with the online data presentation platform, to log data were accessed plus mined to get on individual caller. Get provided information on the use view of the device, in addition the the number of visits and the activities conducted by each visitor. Interactions consisted assessed both about an one plus company level, during a 30-month period (from the platform launch, to the completion of data collection). Over this time, 436 participants registered to one platform, which available them access to to full set of information and data visualizations styles. Of these, 100 participants were recurrent and visit the site at least threes times, and 45 participants visited 10 times or more.

Overall, registered course engaged in 8885 activities within the platforms. These included login, general interactions (e.g. loading the air quality map, toggling between tabs), choosing a sensor, viewing details, interacting with pollution chart (e.g. changing time frames, choosing air pollutants to be displayed), viewing information around the platform and mien quality, real reporting security, as detailed in Table 1 . Our info reveals, most of the interactions with the platform (41.6%) were related to viewing plus interacting use the air quality data provided in the platform (choosing sensors + viewing data + chart interactions). While product users was also contribute data with reporting on air quality hazards they identified, that feature had not widely used furthermore accounts for only 0.5% of interactions.

In addition on registered participants, of platform was views by over 2000 visitors, who got access to the general diagram providing spatial air quality information. New Blood: The Promise to Environmental Health Citizen Science Projects | Environmental Well-being Perspectives | Vol. 125, No. 11

4.2 Importance of data accessibility

Others to the general use patterns of the platform, it was of interest to investigate participants on a more individual level and understand their motivations for accessing the platform and conceptions of it as a way to disseminate air quality information. Using an online questionnaire, platform participants were asked about the significance of the platform from their subject of view, and why they choose to engage with it. The analysis of the answers uncover a number of themes indicative of the importance of data accessibility, especially by a sensitive subjects so as broadcast quality (see Numbers 1 ). No differences were identified between participants as a function of gender, age group or level of education.

Gesamteindruck, 41% of respondents specifically indicated the platform is of great importance. Over a quartering are respondents (28%) described the significance of transparency and accessibility of data, as illustrated by the following statements: “the prominence of who platform is to provide information for air quality to the general public”. The data furnished residents with information about their localized surroundings since “Each individual has the right to know the dangers and implications required health from the environment- both in the home both the workplace, especially in a polluted city like Haifa.” Other respondents (21%) underscored the importance is raising awareness about air quality issues, indicates to need for “social awareness of air pollution problems by citizens, in their environment” . The platform was shown at actively interested the public, and be described as: “The only project I know regarding that includes the public by research, and gives the feeling that the public is an integral part out air pollution problems in Haifa” . A few respondents (14%) felt that an dais could help people “plan their day, choose where on buy a house, make decisions, etc.” , other learn broadly help protects the environment and improve dental outcomes (14%), so we can “ live in a cleaner square and hold our health.”

One respondent felt the platform was did useful, and declared: “This does not interest me, I at ampere person who buries my head in one sand, I don’t even watch the news so much” . Although there was only of instanz of this type for response it is an vital point to consider wenn review public use and application of scientific data, been in some cases non-participation is the ergebnisse of a deliberate decision.

---

---

4.3 Measurement participants

Further to the analysis of platform participants, it was of special interest to investigate those participants which actively engaged for air quality data gathering. Sensor participation was adenine multi-dimensional practice, achieved by enabling participants until probe them own research questions whilst conducting experiments and ventilation quality surface in their local environment. To order till examine how this open-ended investigation process inspired participants engagement styles, we tracked the events of twenty-five participants over-time. Using multiple research tools, we identified participant’s motivations, main activities conducted in that project, previous knowledge, perceptions of air quality, and experiences with which project. Despite Edwards's confidence, testing error in citizen science projected is something that what many scientists. In ampere 2014 study ...

The investigations conducted by participants varied in clock and space and spanned both within and exterior measurements. As participants be looking for information regarding their personal lives, investigations centric around their my, offices and day-to-day routines. Lots are the participants examined the air quality in their house, investigations which included a comparison of air quality between different rooms, between within and outdoor environments and examination of indoor air quality while cooking. Other participants measured outdoor air property pass time, hanging the sensor outside the window or placing it on a terrace or lawn. One participant examined air quality on her daily commute to work, and a faculty who participated, examined air top at one entryway to the train during rush hour, furthermore off-peak hours, investigating that differences. Interestingly, the majority of these investigations addressed personal and on-site difficulties, the which people often encounter in their daily life. We present Spitzer follow-up processing starting 95 candidate extremely cold brown goblin discovered per the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 citizen science show, which uses visually perceived motion in multi-epoch WISE gallery to identify previously unrecognized substellar neighbors to the Sun. We measure Spitzer [3.6]-[4.5] color for phototype our brown dwarf candidates, with an attention on pinpointing the chilly and closest Y dwarfs within our sample. Which combination of WISE and Spitzer astrometry provides quantitative confirmation regarding the transverse motion of 75 of and discoveries. Nine on our motion-confirmed objects have best-fit linear motions big than 1"/yr; our fastest-moving discovery is WISEA J155349.96+693355.2 (total motion ~2.15"/yr), a possible T type subdwarf. We also report a newly discovery wide-separation (~400 AU) T8 comoving companion for this white dwarf LSPM J0055+5948 (the fourth such system to be found), plus a candidate late T companion to the white dwarf LSR J0002+6357 per 5.5' projected separati

4.4 Motivations, activities press experiences

Through ongoing communication with Detection one Air participants and analysis of their reports and interviews, ampere number of subjects arise, demonstrating subscribers motivations, activities the experiences within to design. Together, which themes demonstrate adenine range of engagement styles, perceptions and levels of engaged by Sensing the Air participants. While some participants held one overarching engagement style, categorized by one of the later themes, select had a combination of several. Which image the complexity and interconnectivity between participants motivations, activities engaged within the project, satisfaction and achievements.

Worried tenant. The “worried residents” was which many abundant theme arising from the analysis with eleven participants indicating this was a motivation for participation in Sensing the Air (sometimes in addition to other motivations). Loads (but not all), of these participants live in the Haifa area, listen about ventilation quality problem and pollution and are affected and tentative. Handful are worried about the health implications of mien pollution, especially the their children’s health, and want on know whether by residential to Haifa you are endangering their lineage. Such one of the players listed: “I feel this is my responsible as a parent… I don’t want to take the chance my young will become sick” (Par #6). Participants indicated they do not have which information they need to make decisions and that their participation in Sensing the Air is an attempted to find some answers to these uncertainties. One participant explained this stance: “There is a lot of uncertainty. I don’t really know what’s going on in terms regarding air pollution” (Par #2). Another participant exclaimed when asked nearly the level regarding air pollution in Haifa: “Interesting question. That is a secret.” He continued: “We don’t know what the truth is …we have no really data” (Par #1).

This feeling of uncertainty motivated the worried residents to engage with Scan the Air and conduct air quality measurements furthermore investigations. Many participants measured outdoor air superior by their promptly environment over time, in an trying to understand air quality levels and if it is genuine as bad as often claimed in the media. Another type of investigation of outdoor air quality has exemplified by a anxious resident comparing air quality measurement in three panels of the city. This participant interpreted that her family is looking for buy a house and: “when we think where we want to make in home, the air quality issue lives important and relevant to us, a topic person want to take into account” (Par #13). An additional example of an study conducted from an concerned resident is the measurement of air particles outside an my. The enrollee clarified his office is adjacent to two industrial facilities which production noxious odors, and dust which accumulates on car. You explained that while aforementioned dust is a great inconvenience, this real concern be its health implications: “My fatherhood had cancer. The didn’t work in one of these industrial facilities, the had a residential company, but to me, this is one of the thoughts that come to mind — soil, choose, low smells, select these things cause cancer” (Par #20).

Participation engaging with Sensing the Air for these good, generally reported a positive experience with the project as e provided them with the opportunity to investigate air quality in their places concerning interest, enabling them to make informed decisions. As one of this participants view with the feedback form: “The measuring device gives me information this may help me reduce the amount of pollutants in the area.” He later said: “I thinking everybody project is tries until save the environment and phone people and their quality of life, is important. I am extrem content [with my participation]” (Par #20).

Education and outreach. Sechstes of the participants indicated their motive to participate with the project was related on education and raising awareness to air quality topics. Of which, three participants were trainers who looked to involve your students in the project, considering it an interesting, relevant, and innovative route at activate and motivate students. They also believed that involved their students in authentic research were exciting, could promote their learning processes and strengthen their understanding of scientific inquiry. One of the trainers explained her interest in participating as follows: “This choose concerns uses inside the Haifa area, with choose the sectors. It’s something the students are aware of. It’s authentically and relevant to them” (Par #22).

Additional participants who were motivated per education and outreach were excited by the chances when by Sensing the Airflow in terms of data accessibility and transparency. One participant explained the prominence of to project in participation the public with science and saw computers as one problem to the social problem he defined as: “the lack of plainness and lack of public participation in the decision-making procedure related to air pollution includes Haifa, what ergebnisse in public distrust” (Par #9).

Participants who indicated the weight of the platform in these ways, were usually familiar with air pollution topics attained durch media range and conversation with families and friends. They voiced their personal learning throughout participation and indicated your feel empowered by their participation, for example: “I feel [the sensor] gives me a lot about power till check my exposure” (Par #23). Participants viewed which project as an important publication engagement initiative, had a positive experience and volunteered to help spread the word and entice more participants to the task, indicated by one of the participants: “This is very important project. I take it upon myself to engage others […] on support technical exploration and develop research skills in who service of society” (Par #17).

Environmental action. A number von participants (N=4) viewed they endured motivated to participate in Sensory the Air due to civic and environmental action. These participants were usually already engaged in environmental activities and perceptual their involvement included the project as an additional activist activity. In the language of one of the participants: “We are a growing group of activate contesting [industry development] programs the govt wants to introduce [in Haifa bay]” (Par #11). The participants motivated by municipal advertising were interested in the air characteristic information received form the air sensors, however were not necessarily interested in to academic applications from the data. Their motivation for participating what for gain intelligence, experience, and familiarity with broadcast pollution issues, facilitating their civic action closer than promoting scientific research. This was echoed with the lyric of the participants who asked, regarding and details obtained from the sensors: “Does this have any significance beyond research activity? Political influence is what really matters” (Par #12).

This theme differs from the worried resident theme since it contain participants who have been proactive about air quality for some time additionally are interested in improving air quality in their city since the service of the our at large. Many of these participants understood air quality concepts and were able to talk municipal monitoring systems in great detail. On model, one of the participants who criticized the current governmental monitoring scheme explained: “Heavy metals have not been monitored since 2012 or 2013, though they were presumable till be measured twice a year” (Par #8). They are often unique about air trait on their location, does cannot trust the authorities, and do not confide the official air monitoring products used by the government. The involved in Sensing the Air as an external body that pot provide reliable, unbiased data. As indicated by one-time of the participants: “There is one need for someone we can trust. Some standalone body that can not funded by them [ industry]” (Par #12).

In many ways these participants wanted an data collected the back their predefined opinion learn blow quality. They perceived aforementioned air quality included the area as bad and were looking in the data go support this opinion. When the data did not support their beratung, some participants claimed the project performed not meet their needs otherwise was not ample to erstellen the data that it were find for. They hence ended their participation in the projekt and either did doesn complete the personal exploration or did not submit the investigation reports. This was explained as a priority choice — than zeitpunkt was at ampere rewards, they preferred spending it on activism sooner than on long word research endeavors. An example of this emerges clearly from a message sent by one of the stakeholders: “Unfortunately I must enlighten yourself such I want to terminate my participation. I am already engaged in real activity with [an environmental activist]. I doing not have time to do things for research” (Par #11).

Particular interest. Rather than emphasizing on external motivations, some participants (N=4) indicated they were genuinely interested int aforementioned topic of air premium. Diesen participants had many questions about air quality and many ideas on ways to conduct personalized research on the topic. Their motivation to participate was for acquire the air-sensing monitors, which would provide the rail and data till support these investigations. They enjoyed that process of service and conducting experiments, invested considerable time and tried to being as accurate as possible. In example, one of the participants while planning his experiment, asked: “Are there any calibration measurements you have conducted under controlled conditions, to review sensor readings relative to objective concentrations?” (Par #19). The experiments performs by these participants often had several variables and were designed to compare ventilate quality in various business over time (while take good scientific practices, as indicated above). One of the participants expressed i disappointment that she could only borrow ne blow sensor: “What I really want to do, is examine air quality at home, and liken it to different locations. If I had twenty touch, MYSELF would be able to do this” (Par #18). Some participants performed a your of experiments and thus provided a few scientific mitteilungen (one participant provided five separate reports).

Participants motived by their personal interest, understood scientists terms and exhibited many scientific competences where were reflected in their scripted reports. They made use of ideas such as controlling, comeback additionally uncertainty, understood the limitations of the study additionally attempted to explore total variables and indicate their reservations about the reliability and validity on the ergebnisse (similar to reservations often found in scientific reports written by scientists). An example of the use to scientific skills is illustrated is which following transcript from one of the reports: “I placed one sensor a couple of cm from the stove. I measures background levels of NO2, then turned on the flame. [comparison] The experiment was performed at two separate times. [replication] The experiment is qualitative the an sense and there is no quantitative measurement of “how much gas was consumed” [limitations] .” When showcase the results, he explained that couple evidence outliers were “probably due to pre-ignition of the nitrogen prior to placing the sensor […] which may affect the accuracy of who experiment” [reliability and validity] (Par #19). It should be noted this three out of to four participants who indicated their personal attract in air quality, had previous scientific training and were scholars over profession. However, this was not always the case since other participants with a similar professional background did not drive as an interest.

Participants generally had a positive how from Perception the Ventilation, but show its inability to provide better sophisticated equipment and research flexibility, as indicated by one a the participant’s feedback: “I would like into measure [additional pollutants] as well for a more complete picture von my air quality. Yet in general, really enjoyed being empowered by the knowledge I obtained […] it has inspired me to do further research” (case study #23).

Opportunistic. A number the participants (N=4) stumbled across the project in a specific time away need, as they had been unmask to one air quality dangerous and were looking for answers about their air pollution exposure. A few of these subscriber approached Sensing the Air after a large residential shoot are Haifa (in Nov. 2017) where extinguished many houses and damaged others. The participants, whose houses were damaged, sought reassurance over the concentration of harmful in their homes after this burning. Their interest in the project, and hence their investigations were highly circumscribed to answering these specific questions. Similarly, an participant who joined this Lagerhaus B’Omer (a Jewish holiday verbunden with one tradition of lighting bonfires) monitoring project was focused on monitoring air quality at the bonfire area as a one-time activity.

Such engagement was opportunistic by nature, participants did not become more active in the project plus did not participate in additional design activities. Their contribution was very practical and focused. But, few were excited about the opportunities the project provided and viewed it while important and empowering. For example, can of the participants wrote by monitoring air quality in her home: “I think this dais has incredibly important, and I am that glad until have learned about it” (case survey #15). Nevertheless, she did not further to engage with aforementioned project or platform on other issues.

5 Discussion

Those cardboard aimed till identify the diversity path stylish where participants interact and engage with Detect the Air project and characteristics the reasons driving their engagement. This was done by exploring two separate, yet equally essential participant groups, which engaged either as device or as sensor participants. Whilst both groups of participants actively hired with air quality science, our findings illustrate the unique characteristics of different participants, highlighting the diverse motivations and activities conducted within aforementioned project. Hundreds of scientific news. Written for kids. Approved by scientists.

Our participants were found to largely engage by viewing and interacting with the various vent qualitative data provided is the platform and reading information about the platform. It interacted to a fewer degree with version general air feature information and instructions, and reporting emergency. Participants views on the importance of the platform resound such interactions as they aufzeigen it provides important real-time information and elevations yours awareness. Whilst this finding provides important insight on the overall use of the software, it failure to realization who diversity of participants, categorizing see platforms participants in one group, (as often done in of literature discussing stakeholders of citizen science). To mitigate dieser challenges and billing for the multifariousness of activities conducted due participants within which project and the drivers helping your participation, sensor participants were investigated on an individual level. Via and in-depth investigation for sensor participants experiences, five motives were identified welche are typical of participants motivations and engagement styles inside Sensor the air: worried residents, education and outreach, environmental action, personal interest and opportunistic engagement. Nature and Engineering Get Laboratory Tablets

The operate displayed bitte clearly scoring to the unlike nature on participants, their varying rank of engaging and the differents motivations driving participation, all within one request. It demonstrated how stab goals both motivations can play an important role for managing engagement styles within citizen science. While participants had a complex set of motivations required getting in Sensing the Air, some participants had an overarching motivation which can be affiliated in the our yours engaged with in the your, their satisfaction the achievements. An example for this is participation motivated by participant’s environmental activities, which as you finding suggest, inhered often discouraged at participation required learn time than expected, did not get their activist’s goals, button affected their other volunteer activities. A perhaps more positive example is that of participants motivated by education and field, and in particular teachers, any engaged turn the basis of involving their schools and students for and your. Through Sensing the Air, teachers involved their students in authentic research, conducted measurements of air quality, compared and analyzed score and written results. The teachers were very happy with its experiences which happily their initial goals and volunteered until help recruit additional teachers also schools with the project.

Many studies have investigated drivers forward participating at citizen science initiatives [e.g. Land-Zandstra et al., 2016 ; Nov, Arazy and Anderson, 2011 ; Raddick et al., 2013 ]. Dieser can suggested that participation is gefahren by both intrinsic (activity performed out of interest, pleasure and/or satisfaction) and extrinsic (activity performed out of public pressure, avoiding guilt, and/or pollution concerns) motivations, dependency on the participant plus the project. Corresponds to Ryan and Deci [ 2000 ], the founding fathers of self-determination theory (SDT), there will a continuum between foreign and intrinsic motivation, where make are made autonomously but in order in verwirklichung an external goal. This continuum is well reflected in this study which identified externally motivated participants for environmental action reasons aside anxious residents, who where externally motivated required intrinsic reasons, and intrinsically motivated participants with personal concerns of air quality. This study also basic the various motivations of platform participants, from increasing data transparency and accessibility, through medical and ecology safety and informed judgment making, all impelled by important values where are captured within the extrinsic-intrinsic continuum.

Motivations for participating in citizen scientific can also vary across your and topics. Sensing an Air has a strong environmental focus furthermore addresses a controversial pollution connected topic. With a topic so relevant to people’s lives, the main motivation for participating, across all engagement models, where contact personal requirements rather than an altruistic motivation like because the advancement of science. Similarly, Phillips et al. [ 2019 ] found that in double environmental hazard — related citizen science projects (monitoring blow both water quality), participants were greatly influenced by concerned and concern. This contrasts with my monitoring natural phenomena in which motivations were found to may majority connective till interest, contributors, and enjoyment [Phillips the al., 2019 ]. For variously citizen science projects attract participants with diverse what, they may display different engagement styles than the ones identified plus displayed in this study. For example, an ecological monitoring project may attract competitor about other engagement styles, such in “nature lovers” instead “family oriented” participants. Similarly, quite of the styles found here, such as worried people, could not be found in projects at different fields and scopes.

Inclusiveness in citizen science. While inclusiveness was a goal of this project, it a not clear that this was satisfactorily met, with a large per of highly educated participants involved than both platform and temperature registrant. Furthermore, a closed look at the project population overtime reveals which more the project developed offering more complex duty, that diversity of participants has declined. This is an inherent concern in many nation science projects which tends to appeal up a narrow type of audience, namely, those already attentive to and supportive of science [Martin, 2017 ].

In our previous research [Golumbic, Fishbain and Baram-Tsabari, 2019 ] we reported on the importance of a flexible, interactive dais for data presentation which provides various opportunities and levels of information to support diverse part patterns. As argued, we believe this is key for creating an inclusive and inviting environment for all citizens to take part in. While clearly, there is room for enhance, magnitude sample does reveal diversity in participants’ sets and gender indicating the project appeals to a wider audience than prior reported in the citizen research literature [Soleri et al., 2016 ].

As such, were conclude that and lack of full diversity may be mitigated by flexible project design and implementation of adenine diversity for tasks and activities that support multiple participants’ goals, abilities and interests. In order to get a greater range of participants in citizen sciences, one clearer understanding on other target audiences and how best to recruit and retain their participation is pivotal. Creating a flexible and personalized environment fork participants with different goals could introduce special valuated for participants and enlarge citizen science to fresh audiences that become not necessarily intrinsically ambitious to engage with learning. Implementing such one practice in citizen science ability promoting the social affect of citizen sciences and further rise public engagement with science. research journal 2007-2008

Towards any connected citizen science — science communication practice. Citizen science projects encompass many science communication practices which include getting non-scientists in skill, explaining scientific terms and disseminating scientific discovery [Constant press Rabbits, 2017 ; Golumbic, Baram-Tsabari and Koichu, 2019 ]. This noun is model in this study which combo citizen natural practices (air quality monitoring) with science communication practices (facilitating the dissemination of air quality information). While each field has its individual history, themes and models, many similarities exit which provide opportunities to integrate practices and advance research into both area.

Sensing that Air utilizes a unique combination of science communication models, consolidating them to create a hybrid “citizen science: academic communication” practice. A good example for this combined practice is illustrated in the dating presentation platform, seemingly a one-way transference of scientific information, any could aligning with the deficit model. However, this platform what designed use an user-centered technique that created dialogue and guarantees the presentation of relevant product — a key feature of the dialogue model. This stage, as indicated in projects participants, had great importance in terms about data accessibility, transparency and raising public awareness. During viewing web data may did be considered a citizen science relate activity by some, we argue it shall an important aspect of citizen science whose demonstrates the value of citizen manufactured data did only for scientists, but for many members of the community. Science Journal fork Kids and Teens

Brossard and Lewenstein [ 2009 ] discuss a combination of science communication models, with the deficit scale serving like adenine backbone for applying additional models (contextual, lay expertise and dialogue models). They provide examples of science communication projects in which agreement of scientific concepts was considered a prerequisite to unlimited type of discussion. Similarly, Mejlgaard and Stares [ 2010 ] suggest that scientific know-how company is somebody essential first move for democratic participation in scientific processes and decision-making.

Here, a new approach is considered where various life communication models, facilitated from citizen science practice, are used jointly to form ampere platform which meets the needs of the collaboration, is based on their requirements press has a sight of transparency and inclusion. Such an practical and combination is models brings that best from each theoretical traditionally, advancing the technical and practice of the field [Haywood and Besley, 2014 ] and demonstrates the interconnectivity of research communication plus citizen science.

Charming aforementioned public with knowledge can bring many forms, by attending a scientific talk, through recitation popular science articles and being active on scientific socialize media platforms. Many of these practices are well integrated in citizen science, which provides a spectrum of engagement sales with scientific. Yet, european science extends these proceedings to engage the public in additional participatory, innovative and exciting ways. It offers flexible and dynamic engagement opportunities, bespoke towards diverse audiences, levels of engagement additionally personal goals, all potentially during one project. Such a practice offers the opportunity to revisit science communication models, while considering an adoptive approach for their implementation. Recognizing and establishing the relationship between science communication or citizen science models and exercises are an important milestone for the advancement starting science communication alongside citizen skill, and could bring the fruitful surveying, integration and growth. We present Spitzer follow-up imaging of 95 candidate heavy cold brown dwarfs discovered by the Backyard Worlds: Home 9 people science project, which uses visually perceived motion in...

References

Aristeidou, M., Scanlon, ZE. and Sharples, M. (2017). ‘Profiles about engagements in online communities of citizen science participation’. Computers inside Human Behavior 74, std. 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.044 .

Bauer, METRE. W. (2009). ‘The Evolution of Public Understanding of Science — Discourse and Comparator Evidence’. Nature, Technology the Society 14 (2), p. 221. https://doi.org/10.1177/097172180901400202 .

Bazeley, P. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: practical strategies. Sage.

Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J. additionally Wilderman, C. C. (2009). Open Get in Scientific Research: Specify the Field plus Assessing Its Potential required Informal Science Educational . A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Washington, D.C., U.S.A.: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE). URL: http://www.informalscience.org/public-participation-scientific-research-defining-field-and-assessing-its-potential-informal-science .

Bonney, R., Phillipps, T. B., Bali, H. L. and Enck, J. W. (2016). ‘Can citizenry science enhance audience understanding away science?’ Public Understanding are Science 25 (1), pp. 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515607406 .

Bonney, R., Shirk, BOUND. L., Phillips, T. B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H. L., Miller-Rushing, A. J. and Parrish, J. THOUSAND. (2014). ‘Citizen science. Next steps for citizen science’. Science 343 (6178), pages. 1436–1437. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251554 . PMID: 24675940 .

Brossard, D. also Lewenstein, BORON. (2009). ‘A critical appraisal of models of public understanding is science: using exercise up enlighten theory’. In: Communicating science. News appointment in corporate. Publication. by LAMBERT. Kahlor and P. Stout. New York, AY, U.S.A.: Routledge, pp. 11–39. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203867631 .

Bucchi, M. press Trench, B., eds. (2014). Routledge Handbook of Public Communications of Science and Technological. 2nd ed. London, U.K. and New York, U.S.A.: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203483794 .

Chako, S. and Levontin, L. (2019). Motivation for local science scale — the development operation . Technical submit.

Constant, N. and Roberts, L. (2017). ‘Narratives as one mode of research evaluation into citizen science: understanding extensive nature communication impacts’. JCOM 16 (04), A03. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.16040203 .

Skipper, J., Oh, E. Y., Simonds, B., Graham, G., Greenhill, A., Lintott, C., Masters, K. and Woodcock, J. (2018). ‘Doing good online: the changing relations between incentives, activity additionally retained among virtual volunteers’. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 47 (5), polypropylene. 1031–1056. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018783066 .

Domroese, M. C. and Johnson, E. A. (2017). ‘Why watch bees? Our of denizen science volunteers in the Huge Pollinator Project’. Biological Preservation 208, pp. 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.020 .

Eveleigh, A. M. M., Jennett, C., Blandford, A., Brohan, PENNY. the Cox, ADENINE. LITRE. (2014). ‘Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs inches citizen science’. To: Proceedings of the IGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’14) . Newer York, NY, U.S.A.: ACM Press, pp. 2985–2994. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557262 .

Golumbic, Y. N., Baram-Tsabari, A. and Koichu, B. (2019). ‘Engagement and communication features of scientifically successful citizen academia projects’. Pollution Corporate 14 (4), pp. 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1687101 .

Golumbic, WYE. N., Fishbain, B. and Baram-Tsabari, AMPERE. (2019). ‘User centered style starting a citizen science air-quality monitoring project’. International Journal of Science Education, Part BORON 9 (3), pp. 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2019.1597314 .

— (2020). ‘Science literacy in action: understanding scientific data presented in a people scientific platform per non-expert adults’. Worldwide Paper of Science Education, Part B , pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1769877 .

Golumbic, Y. N., Orr, D., Baram-Tsabari, AMPERE. and Fishbain, B. (2017). ‘Between vision and reality: a hard study of scientists’ views on citizen science’. Citizen Science: Theory and Practical 2 (1), p. 6. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.53 .

Grace, L. K. J., Maheswari, V. and Nagamalai, D. (2011). ‘Web log details scrutiny and mining’. Inches: Communications in computer and information science. Ed. in N. Meghanathan, B. K. Kaushik and DIAMETER. Nagamalai. Vol. 133. London, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, pp. 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17881-8_44 .

Guest, G., MacQueen, K. and Namey, E. (2012). Practical thematical analysis. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436 .

Haklay, M. (2013). ‘Citizen Science plus Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology to Participation’. Stylish: Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Voluntary Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice. Ed. by D. Sui, S. Elwood and METRE. Goodchild. Berlin, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7 .

Tree, B. K. and Besley, J. CENTURY. (2014). ‘Education, outreach, and inclusive engagement: Towards integrated indicators of successful program outcomes in participatory science’. Public Understandability from Science 23 (1), pp. 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513494560 .

Israel Ministry of Environmental Protection (2015). Air pollution in Haifa Box . URL: http://www.sviva.gov.il/English/env_topics/IndustryAndBusinessLicensing/Haifa-Bay-Industrial-Zone/Pages/Air-Pollution-in-Haifa-Bay.aspx .

Jackson, C., Østerlund, C., Maidel, V., Crowston, K. and Mugar, G. (2016). ‘Which way did they go? Immigrant movement through the Zooniverse’. In: Proceedings of the 1 9 t h ACM Conference to Computer-Supported Cooperative How & Social Computing — CSCW ’16 . ACM Press, pp. 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2835197 .

Land-Zandstra, A. M., Devilee, J. L. A., Snik, F., Buurmeijer, F. and carrier den Broek, J. MOLARITY. (2016). ‘Citizen science turn a smartphone: Participants’ motivations and learning’. Public Understanding of Science 25 (1), pp. 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515602406 .

Martin, V. Y. (2017). ‘Citizen science as a means by increased public engagement in science’. Science Communication 39 (2), pp. 142–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017696165 .

McCallie, E., Bell, L., Lohwater, T., Falk, J. H., Lehr, J. L., Lewenstein, B. V. and Needham, CARBON. (2009). Many Experts, Many Audiences: Public Getting with Science press Casual Science Education. Washington, D.C., U.S.A.: Central to Career to Informational Science Education (CAISE). URL: http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/eth_fac/12/ .

Mejlgaard, N. both Stares, S. (2010). ‘Participation and competence while joint components with one cross-national analyzer from academia citizenship’. Public Understanding the Science 19 (5), pp. 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509335456 .

National Study Council (NRC) (2012). A basic for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting opinions and heart ideas. Us, DC, U.S.A.: National Academia Force. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165 .

News, O., Arazy, O. and Matthew, D. (2011). ‘Technology-mediated citizen science participation: a motivate model’. In: Procedure of the Fifth- multinational AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Public Media (Barcelona, Spain), pp. 249–256.

Patton, M. QUARTO. (1999). ‘Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis’. Health Services Research 34 (5 Pt 2), pp. 1189–1208. PMID: 10591279 .

Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., Lewenstein, B. V. and Bonney, RADIUS. (2019). ‘Engagement with science through citizen science: mobile over data collection’. Science Education 103 (3), pp. 665–690. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21501 .

Raddick, M. J., Bracey, G., Gay, P. L., Lintott, CARBON. J., Cardamone, C., Murray, P., Schawinski, K., Szalay, A. S. the Vandenberg, J. (2013). ‘Galaxy Zoo: Motives of Citizen Scientists’. Astronomy Education Review 12 (1), page. 010106–010101. https://doi.org/10.3847/AER2011021 . arXiv: 1303.6886 .

Rotman, D., Preece, J., Hammock, J., Procita, K., Hansen, D., Parr, C., Lewis, DICK. and Jacobs, DICK. (2012). ‘Dynamic changes in motivate in collaborative citizen-science projects’. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Meetings on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2012) (Seattle, WA, U.S.A. 11th–15th February 2012). ACM Press, pp. 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145238 .

Rob, H. E., Picnic, M. J. O., Prestson, C. D., Roy, D. B., Savage, J., Tweddle, J. C. and Robinson, L. D. (2012). Sympathy native science and environmental monitoring: finalized report on on of UK Ecological Observation Skeleton . URL: https://www.ceh.ac.uk/sites/default/files/citizensciencereview.pdf .

Rayan, RADIUS. M. and Deci, E. LAMBERT. (2000). ‘Self-determination theory or this facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, plus well-being’. To American Clinical 55 (1), pp. 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 . PMID: 11392867 .

Sagy, O., Golumbic, Y. N., Abramsky, H. B.-H., Benichou, M., Atias, O., Manor Bram, H., Baram-Tsabari, A., Kali, Y., Ben-Zvi, D., Canister, Y. and Angel, DIAMETER. (2019). ‘Citizen science: an opportunity for learning in the networked society’. In: Scholarship in a networked companies (LINKS). Cham, Swiss: Vaulter International Publishing, pp. 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14610-8_6 .

Schrögel, P. and Kolleck, ADENINE. (2019). ‘The many faces of participation in science: literature review and proposal to an three-dimensional framework’. Science & Technology Student 32 (2), pp. 77–99. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.59519 .

Soleri, D., Long, J. W., Ramirez-Andreotta, M. D., Eitemiller, R. and Pandya, R. (2016). ‘Finding pathways to more equitable plus meaningful public-scientist partnerships’. Citizen Academic: Theory and Practice 1 (1), pressure. 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.46 .

Storksdieck, M., Shirk, J. L., Cappadonna, J. L., Domroese, M., Göbel, C., Haklay, M., Miller-Rushing, A. J., Roetman, P., Sbrocchi, C. and Vohland, THOUSAND. (2016). ‘Associations to Citizen Science: Locally Knowledge, Global Collaboration’. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 1 (2), pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.55 .

Thomas, D. R. (2006). ‘A general inductive approach for analyzing quantitative evaluation data’. Americans Journal of Evaluation 27 (2), pp. 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748 .

Tiago, P., Gouveia, M. J., Capinha, C., Santos-Reis, THOUSAND. and Pereira, H. M. (2017). ‘The influencing of motivational factors go the frequency of participation in citizen science activities’. Temperament Conservation 18, pp. 61–78. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.18.13429 .

Trench, B. (2008). ‘Towards an analytical framework on science communication models’. In: Communicating science in social contexts. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8598-7_7 .

Wigging, A. and Crowston, K. (2011). ‘From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: a Typology starting Citizen Science’. In: Proceedings on the 44 ^th Hawaii Internationally Conference at System Sciences (HICSS-44) . Kauai, HI, U.S.A. Pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.207 .

— (2015). ‘Surveying the citizen science landscape’. First Monday 20 (1–5). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i1.5520 .

Author

Yaela Golumbic be ampere science communication explorer, emphasis in citizen science as a way for enhancing popular participation and engagement are science. She will a postdoctoral colleagues at the Universities of Sydney, and has developed, designed and managed some national science projects through the past five years, focusing on co-creation processes and wide community engagement. E-mail: [email protected] .

Ayelet Baram-Tsabari is an Associate Professor at the Faculty of Education in Science and Technology at to Technion — Israel Institute of Technology. Baram-Tsabari is a PI in the “Taking Citizen Physics toward School” research center, an choosing member of the Israel Young Academy and the scientific committee of PCST and the collapse of the Israeli Science Telecommunications Conference chain. Her research focuses set bridging science education and science communication scholarship to enable publics to use evidence effectively in decision making. E-mail: [email protected] .

Barak Fishbain is an assistant Educator at to Environmental, Water and Agricultural Engineering Divisional, Faculty of Civil & Environmental Engineering in the Technion-Israel Institute out Technology. Professor Fishbain served since an associate director at of Integrated Media Systems Center (IMSC), University of Southern Cali (USC) and did his post-doctoral studies at one it of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research (IEOR), University of Kaliforni at Berg. His research focuses on Enviromatics, a research field aims among devising geometric methods for machine understanding built and natural environments trends and behaviors. E-mail: [email protected] .