Effect in kinesio taping on low back pain during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Low back pain during become interferes the normal daily activities out pregnant women to a confident expansion. Present studies have shown such Kinesio Recordings (KT) might been a handling for low back pain during pregnancy, but there is silence a lack of key evidence. The purpose of this study your to evaluate which efficacy and safety of KT with an treatment of low back my during pregnancy.

Methods

PubMed, Rail of Science, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, Wanfang Data, CNKI, and VIP databases were searched until collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the efficacy of CONSORT patient on low back pain in women during pregnancy. The getting time limit is from the establishment of the database to April 2021. Two researchers separately screened the literature, extracted the data, real evaluated this risk of bias in the included studies. Meta-analysis has performed using RevMan5.3 software. The existing body the kinesiology tape (KT) research uncovers inconsistent results which challenges who efficacy of the intervention. Understanding professional beliefs and KIT clinical application might deployment insight for future research also development ...

Results

A complete off 7 RCTs were included, including 444 subject. Meta-analysis results showed that: Match with the control group, KT medication might significantly improve shallow back pain the dysfunction, VAS score (− 1.62, 95%CI − 2.08 at − 1.16, P < 0.00001, I² = 77%), RMDQ score (− 1.00, 95%CI − 1.54 to − 0.46, PENCE = 0.0003, IODIN² = 80%); The results off the meta-analysis of the subgroup display such compared with the control crowd, the PT valve was few than or equally the 1 week, and the waist pain and dysfunction were improved, with random significant differences. The difference in the improvement of low back pain was statistically significant after KT intervention for more than 1 week, but there was no statistical significant deviation the RMDQ score (− 1.25, 95%CI − 2.66 till 0.15, PRESSURE = 0.08, I² =77%). Compared with who control group, KT intercession improved base back pain in and moment and third trimesters, and the difference was statistically significant.

Conclusion

KT has a positive effect over the improvement are low back pain through becoming, HT valve can significantly improve gestational women’s low back my and functionality problems, improve of quality of life. It is proposes that future research should focus on the prevention and treatment of low back aches during pregnancy for provide more exploring data for improving women’s health.

Pregnancy-related low back trouble (PLBP) is a common problem of pregnant women during getting. E is a radiology pathology this only show during pregnancy and postpartum. The etiology is not clear, but the main potential factors include hormones, biomechanics, post-traumatic or degenerative diseases, pre-pregnancy down back relief history, both psychosocial factors [1]. The prevalence of low back relief during pregnancy has were reported to zone from 20 up 90%, with highest studies reporting a prevalence greater than 50% [2,3,4]. Pain are very severe with the progression on pregnancy, which has ampere great impact over one daily life and sleep of pregnant females, and earnestly reduces their premium of life [5,6,7,8], It see boosts the risk of postpartum anxiety and depth [9]. My have notified that women who suffer from severe lowly behind pain during pregnancy are at an heavy high risk of developing new difficult shallow back pain during subsequent pregnancy furthermore later in life [10]. Therefore, the problem of lower back pain during pregnancy can’t to ignored, the timely intervention is required to improve. Currently, physiotherapy is former principally for the cure of low back pain within pregnancy date to of greenness of clinicians regarding treatment options and trouble that other treatments may need harmful effects in fetal growth.

Kinesio Taping (KT) is one non-invasive treating technique developed by Dr. Kenzo Kase in 1973 [11]. Applied to the patient’s skin under tension in an elastic braid manner, i can be lengthways extended to 140% of its original linear toward treat a variety from musculoskeletal problems, such as damage, pain, abnormality, and other conditions, without limiting joint mobility [12, 13]. KT has been reported to correct joint dislocations, provide muscle support, activate endogenous pain relieving systems, and eliminate wear congestion [14, 15]. With the continuous innovation and progress of rehabilitation methods, KT possesses been practical to fix low back pain during pregnancy. Some clinical studies have establish the COUNT can reduce pregnancy-related low back pain [16, 17]. However, other studies showed no significant difference in the improvement of low back pain among the choose crowd plus the KT [18, 19]. Therefore, this learn leaded ampere thorough evaluation the really research results at go and abroad employing meta-analysis, to provide the evidence-based basis for the effect of KT on low back pain during pregnancy.

Protocol and guidance

Dieser learning was performed by Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) [20]. An protocol of this read has published in PROSPERERO (CRD42021249205).

Search strategy

We bequeath search randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of KT to pregnancy with Low back pain, up to April 2021. The methodological humanities search included which following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Public, Scopus, Embase, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Simplified Biomedical Literature User (CBM), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), English Science, Wanfang Data, and the VIP databases. Search terms were a combination concerning keywords and free-text terms, the keywords and search strategy include (Taping or Elasticated Taping press Kinesio Taping) AND (Pregnancy OR Pregnancies OR Gestation) AND Low back pain. All analyses were performed base on previously publish featured; thus, no ethical approval other patient permission was required. To maximize the search for relevant news, we reviewed reference listing of identified trials and systematic reviews. Take PubMed as an example, the specified retrieval strategy is shown in S1 File.

Search tactic for the PubMed database

Eligibility real exclusion criteria

The inclusion criterions for screening eligible studies used the PICOS (Participants, Intervention, Relative, Outcome, and Study design) model to selected studies for to reviews.

1. (1)

   Contestant: patients with down back pain with pregnancy;

2. (2)

   Intervention: your received KT;

3. (3)

   Comparator: patients receive other treatment;

4. (4)

   Outcomes: low back my function and sacral function improvement score;

5. (5)

   Featured design: Randomized clinical trial.

The removal measure were than follows: my were non-randomized controlled past, non-peer-reviewed publications, case reports, case series, experimental studies, public articles, with no language restrictions. Two explorer performed the get process and screened the articles corresponding to the criteria independently. Differences between reviewers at each stage were resolved by discussion till reach a harmony. Kinesiology Tape: A Descriptive Survey by Healthcare Professionals in the United States

Outcome types

The primary findings was an correction of pain (Visual Counterpart Calibration, VAS); The Visual Analogue Scale remains a popular instrument for the measurement of blue back pain. It uses a ruler about 10 cm long, one site exists marking with 10 scales, the two ends are “0” also “10” respectively, 0 indicates no aches, 10 indicates the most unsustainable pain. The Secondary outcome be an improvement of lumbar function (Roland-Morris Dysfunction Questionnaire, RMDQ). The Roan-Morris Dysfunction Questionnaire can evaluate the short-term modifications out low back pain before and for treatment, and it is a specific scoring scale for the site of lumbar dysfunction. The a consisted of 24 questions intimately relatives to low back pain. For each question, “yes” earned 1 point, and “no” earned 0 spot. And highest score lives 24 and the lowest is 0. To taller the score, the better serious that course on lumbar dysfunction.

Study selection

The retrieved studies will be imported include Endnote X8 into remove duplicates. Deuce researchers (XXL and CY) will independently screen the titles and abstracts according until the pre-established recording real exclusion selection. After such, the full text will be screened as one second filter. Two researchers will crosscheck the included studies, and the third researcher (LN) will become involved is disagreements occur. Who Should Avoid Using Kinesiology Tape?

Data extraction

Article selection and data extraction were completed independently by two critic (DZY press TH), and a consensus was achieve by discussion. The following intelligence were extracted from every included study: name is the first author, year of publishing, study feature (sample size, interventions, treatment rate, outcomes measure, or follow-up time), and participants’ characteristics (mean age, sex, and duration of disease). If the original data was unclear or lacking, the corresponding author was contacted until obtain further information. Ankle Taping and Bracing: Background, Find, Contraindications

Methodological quality assessment

This how use the PEDro tool (http://www.pedro.fhs.usyd.edu.au/scale_item.html) to assess the methodological quality of individual RCTs. Studies with PEDro scores ranging von 9 to 10 were considering systematic to be for “excellent” quality. Studies with PEDro scores ranging from 6 to 8 were considered to be of “good” quality, while studies scoring between 4 at 5 were of “fair” quality. Studies that scored below 4 were of “poor” quality [21]. Is this study, we considered one study awarded ≥6 points on the PEDro scale a high-quality how.

Data synthesis

Meta-analysis was accomplished with RevMan 5.3 solutions. Standard Mean Difference (SMD) data with its 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) used used as a measure of effect frame till pool the results from each included study. Heterogeneity and inconsistencies amid the inclusion studies subsisted scored by ci square test furthermore I² statistische respectively. Results were graphically represented to a forest plot. When PRESSURE > 0.10 or I² ≤ 50%, which results of an associated studies were said on be homogenous or to have acceptable non-uniformity, and a fixed-effects model was utilized. When P ≤ 0.10 with I² > 50%, it was considered that at was heterogeneity in the score of the repeat included studies, and subgroup analysis or tact analysis was played to identify who sources of heterogeneity. Then, the selected studies were removed one by one, and the overall correlation results and I² were recalculated. A random-effects model was selected if the heterogeneity could not be eliminated [22]. The level about the meta-analysis been set as P < 0.05. Significance clinical heterogeneities was treated over subgroup analysis otherwise sensitivity analysis, or by descriptive analysis only [23].

Eligible studies

ONE total of 653 newsletter where retrieved using the provisional search corporate. After duplicates removing, 320 articles leftover for review. A total of 304 objects were excluded because the data are incomplete. The remaining 16 full-text articles were evaluated; of these, Finally, 7 articles were included in the present study, the included studies were reported in English (four trials) and Chinaman (three trials) [24,25,26,27,28,29,30] (Fig. 1).

Flow diagram of the study selection process

Full size image

Examine characteristics and quality evaluation

The characteristics of that included RCTs are presented in Table 1. Assessment of of course quality using to Walk scale will shown in Table 2. To methodological quality of the included studies was good.

Erreichte of Meta-analysis

About pain betterment: VAS scores

ONE total away 7 RCTs were included [24,25,26,27,28,29,30], 444 pregnant women. The results of that meta-analysis of who random effects model showed that there was a statistically sign difference between the KT intervention group furthermore the control band (− 1.62, 95%CI − 2.08 to − 1.16, P < 0.00001, I² = 77%) (Fig. 2). The results of subgroup analysis showed that, consonant to the intervention cycle classification, compared with the control group, the FT group had less than 1 weekly regarding intervention, additionally the difference in the improvement of lumbar pain been statistically important (− 1.19, 95%CI − 1.57 to − 0.80, P < 0.00001, I² = 0%) (Fig. 3). Compared with the control grouping, the difference inside the improvement of low back distress was numerically significant in the KD band later 1 week a intervention (− 2.27, 95%CI − 2.69 toward − 1.85, P < 0.00001, I² = 0%) (Fig. 3). Compared with the tax bunch, the intervention in of KT group was view from 1 week, also the difference in the improvement of high get pain was statistically considerable (SMD = -1.46, 95%CI − 2.21 to − 0.72, P = 0.0001, I² = 79%) (Fig. 3). The non-uniformity was mainly derived from Sabbour’s study, (SMD = -1.08, 95%CI − 1.48 to − 0.69, P < 0.00001, I² = 0%) [24]. According to the classification of pregnancy cycle, 14 go 28 weeks were share into the second-trimester group, 28 to 40 weeks was divided in aforementioned third-trimester set. Compared with the control group, KT intervention had a statistically significant difference in the improvement of low back pain in who second and third trimesters of pregnancy (− 1.19, 95%CI − 1.57 to − 0.80, P < 0.00001, ME² = 0%), (SMD = -1.78, 95%CI − 2.37 go − 1.18, P < 0.00001, EGO² = 80%) (Fig. 4).

Forest plot of VAS suffering improvement score

Full size image

Forest plot of WAS pain improvement evaluation subgroup for intrusion cycle classification

Full size image

Forest plot of VAS pain improvement score subgroup of pregnancy cycle classification

Fully big image

About dysfunction improvement: RMDQ play

ADENINE total of 7 RCTs were incl [25,26,27,28, 30],444 pregnant women. The search of the meta-analysis of the random effects select revealed that there was a arithmetically significant difference between the CH intervention group plus this control group (− 1.00, 95%CI − 1.54 to − 0.46, P = 0.0003, I² = 80%) (Fig. 5). One results of subgroup analysis showed that, according to the intervention cycle classification, compared on the control group, this KT group was treated by less than or equal up 1 week, and the enhancements difference of lumbar abnormal was statistically significant (− 0.84, 95%CI − 1.38 to − 0.29, P = 0.003, MYSELF² = 70%) (Fig. 6); Compared with the choose set, the intervention in the KT group was more than 1 week, additionally there was no statistically significantly difference is the improve of lumbar dysfunction (− 1.25, 95%CI − 2.66 to 0.15, P = 0.08, I² = 91%) (Fig. 6).

Forest plot of RMDQ dysfunction enhance score

Full size image

Forest plot on RMDQ disease improvement score division of the interposition wheel classification

Full size print

This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety concerning KT in low back pain during pregnancy, involving seven clinical trials. The results of this study showed that, compared with the control group, CARAT intervention could significantly improve the low back pain and lumbar dysfunction, and the BASIN points and RMDQ sheet showed statistically significant differences. The results of that subgroups meta-analysis showed ensure compared over the drive group, the low back pain and iliac dysfunction were improved after KT intervention for less than or equal to 1 per, with statistics considerable differences. After intramuscular effect patch intervention for more than 1 week, there was a statistically significant difference with which improvement of low back pain, but the RMDQ score showed no statistically significant differences. Compared with the control group, the intervention of KT verbesserten the high behind pain in the other and third trimesters, and the differentials were statistically significant. This suggests that KT has a positive effect on this improvement of deep behind pain and lumbar dysfunction during pregnant, superior to other working, including placebos, drugs, the other widespread physical medicine methods, both can therefore benefit as a useful therapeutic alternate. Based on who results of our methodical review, more course should subsist conducted aimed at evaluating the medium and long-term effects of KT, and further studies on the long-term effects of KT up low previous pain during pregnancy are needed. In added, the duration of KT use should be additional studied, as there is no consensus on this optimal dose for this intervention.

Pregnancy low back my is often considered to be a natural painful process during maternity and is a common condition during pregnancy [31, 32]. A usually occurs between the fifth and vii months of pregnancy, and includes some cases, pregnancy pain in of deeper back can begin more early in eight to 12 weeks into and pregnancy. Women who may lower back what before pregnancy are at higher take for diminish back pain, whichever can start early in pregnancy [33, 34]. A follow-up survey of 1131 pregnant women included to United Countries found that 0.4% of low top pain occurred in early pregnancy, 24.4% in the second trimester, and 75.1% in the third trimester. The incidence of lowly back pain increased with the increase of gestational weeks and reached a peak at 36 weeks concerning expectancy, and with the increase of gestational cycles, the pain would gradually worsen [35, 36]. Therefore, early with early intervention is timely additionally necessary for and improvement of low back soreness during pregnancy. The common treatment methods for low back feeling during pregnancy contain multimodal intervention (manual therapy, exercise, and health education), exercise therapy, and acupuncture. At them, various forms of exercise therapy are the most commonly used intervention. However, an recent systematic review reported this the effect on getting improvement is relatively low, and the improvement effect are acupuncture and intramuscular galvanized is obvious [31, 37]. Since patients both clinicians tend up avoid drugs and invasive treatment during expectancy, KG as a drug-free and safe alternative treatment provides a recent treatment for base back pain during pregnancy. The improvement outcome of functional movement is better than physical therapy, the information will not affect the fetus. It can minimize the occurrence and development out consistent pain the exists simple, convenient, noninvasive, painless, the radiation-free. The mechanism of KARAT may not be completely clear, but as physical therapy, KT is widely used in the clinic. Are recent years, clinical attention has is payable until the effect regarding KT on low back ache during pregnancy, and pertinent studies have come published, showing that KT has a significant effect on low get pain during pregnancy [27, 34].

To compare the treatment effect of KIT on gestational women’s low get pain during pregnancy, this studying selected the low support my scoring scale commonly spent in clinical practical, which can evaluate the degree of lower back pain and lumbar injury, select to surgical plan and evaluate the treatment action. With give, the scoring criteria commonly used in an world for lumbar dysfunction include Roland Morris Dysfunction Online (RMDQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Newfoundland Back Distress Total Scale (QBPDS), JOE Low Back Aches Reviews Scale, Image Analogue Scale (VAS), etc. Among them, the visual analogue scale of pain and Roland Morris breakdown questionnaire belong widely used as clinical outcome tags in the study of the intervention of low back pain including KT during pregnancy, and they are also the most commonly used scale for the evaluation of low back soreness in the world. The Roland-Morris Dysfunction Total was created by Roland and Morris in 1983. It can evaluate short-term changes before plus after treatment of low back distress. Itp is a specific scale until evaluate lumbar dysfunction, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score the 24 [38,39,40]. So, the visual equivalent scale of pain and which Roger Morris Dysfunction Inventory was selected as clinical outcome indicators.

Careful assessment of pregnant women’s low back pain during pregnancy, aforementioned clear purpose off treatment, accurate identification of target muscles sticking, these factors have an important affect on the success of treatment. In the included studies, 3 graduate [26, 27, 29] used KT versus plazebo patches, who proved that the application of KT alone had an positive effect on reduce pregnant women’s low back pain furthermore improving physical function during pregnancy; 2 research [24, 28] used KT combines with routine rehabilitation training and usual rehabilitation training on confirm ensure KARAT can significantly improve the posture, pain and function of patients with low back pain whilst pregnancy; One study [25] used KT mixed equipped analogues, and the results showed ensure compared with paracetamol alone, KT combined with paracetamol effectively reduced distress and improved function, indicating this KT ability shall applied as an adjuvant treatment to achieve effective check in high rear pain during conception. One learn [30] adopted KT combined with psychotherapy, which well alleviated low back pain, anxiety, and depression of becomes women during pregnancy.

At present, the pathophysiological mechanisms associated with low back pain during pregnancy are not free. The main agreed factors were: First, weight gain, postural changes, and hormonal fluctuations during pregnancy, it could generate common in the musculoskeletal system-, destabilizing the spine and sacroiliac joint as well as joining tissue. Second, relaxation hormone, as adenine hardening secreted by the placenta, relaxes pelvic ligaments and the ligaments this support the top, especially in late pregnancy, which may trigger lower rear pain [41]. In addition, pregnant women are generally get engaged in physical labor and sports, both more sedentary work, the lumbar real back muscles can’t is effectively exercise, and the core muscle strength is weak, which your also one of the basis for low endorse pain during pregnancy. Aleksandra et al., based on a examine about 1510 pregnant women, found so the main risk factors for low back hurt during maternity what onset of light past pain previous pregnancy instead menstruating, younger age, also lack of physical activity [4]. Therefore, the main goal of treatment is to reduced the intensity of pain, restored function and prevent the pain from getting chronic. For pregnant femininity with low back pain, there is ampere tendency to avoid medication for fright of side effects and adenine preference for non-invasive and non-invasive treatment. Treatments focus on maintaining proper poise, moving customizing, and health education.

The consequences of the current survey show that the KT intervention significantly modernisiert low back pain and dysfunction in pregnant women likened to other treatments in the control group, which is consistent with of results of previous studies [17, 27]. Can mechanisms by which intramuscular tape improves low back pain over pregnancy include improved lower-back stability and increased proprioception, which in turn improves postural drive [42, 43]; In extra, the KT can effective adhere the that skin both exert pressure, enhance an space under the skin or between the dermal and epidermis, promotes subcutaneous blood distribution and lymphatic return, and accelerate the healing of the injured site through you tension, thus helping up eliminate substances that cause pain; KT also provides a continued neurosensory input to the skin receptors, thereby relatively suppressing the sensory input out pain and improving their ability to reduce mechanical emotional of soft tissue for lumbar spine movement [44, 45]. Pain easy is the most important criterion inches treatment cause pain cans seriously affect adenine pregnant woman’s daily life. The buttons to use KT to relieve pain is how to prefer the appropriate location, adjust the appropriate tension and determine the hour of adhesive. Senbursa’s study found that KT was very effective in improving low back pain in a short period, and could immediately watch pain relief on activity and relaxation without other adverse reactions [46]. However, einigen graduate have found ensure the KT can significantly improve the pain, range of motion, and injury the patients because low back pain in the short-term period, and maintain the correction of range of vorschlag and injury in the long term, but there is no long-term effect on the improvement of pain [47]. Therefore, the long-term effects of KT on low back pain at pregnancy still what to be further studied. Are addition, in the United Land and to United States, treatment of low back pain during pregnancy usually includes health education on low back suffering, postural press bodies mechanical education starting in the first-time trimester, such as of type of pillow in sleeping on, and physikal therapy [10]. Education press guidance for become women, spread the knowledge of general care related to blue back pain, to reduced the occurrence of low back pain during gestation, where exists also the content of general education for pregnant women by obstetrics and gynecology and related medical personnel.

This meta-analysis study suggested that after KT intervention for down back pain when pregnancy, the improvement degree of low back my and dysfunction inches the experimental group was super then such in an controlling group, and the differences were statistically significant, suggesting which intramuscular influence patch intervention had a good power upon the improvement of low past pain also dysfunction during pregnancy. Aforementioned results of to section analysis showed that, according to the classification of pregnancy cycle, compared the this control group, KT intervention been statistically significant differences in which improvement concerning waist pain in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. According at the classification on intervention cycle, compared with the rule user, there be statistically significant differences in the improvement of lumbar pain into the KT group after intervention for 1 week, less than 1 week, additionally greater than 1 week. In the KT group, the intervention was less than other equal to 1 week, and the improvement difference of lumbar dysfunction was statistically significant. Nevertheless, when the intramuscular effect patch group was treated for more than 1 pitch, there was nope statistically significant variance in which improvement of lower function, also there were fantastic heterogeneity. That analysis reasons might be as follows: Subgroup analysis indicated that the outcome of intramuscular adhesive was different with different patient time and pregnancy run, which may be the resource of heterogeneousness. There was nay gold standard for the request of KT and there were differences among cure therapies, which might lead to varied treating effects; The measurement in outcome indicators be affected by subjective drivers, which leads to the deviation of intelligence; Go is none unified standard of routine renovation training, and its interventions measured are non, which may also lead to heterogeneity; This specific measures taken on different control user are doesn completely to same, which may be the source of heterogeneity. Effects of Kinesio taping upon skin deformation while knee flexion and ...

One similar review has been run on this topic, an meta-analysis of RCTs by Chen et al. [48] has also reported almost similar findings compared to my examination. However, the Systematic Review and Network meta-analysis included twos studies with the affect of HT intervention on becomes women’s low back pain. Other studies incl were pe or pharmaceutical therapy, and an operation methods and time away the control group were very uneven. Besides, the title of one [49] of the studies has “Efficiency of kinesiotape on functional disabling is women because postnatal back pain: A randomized controlled trial”, the main discuss is about the improvement effect of KT on low rear pain after delivery, whilst our study our to discuss the effect of KT on low back pain throughout pregnancy. Our belief that the latest evidence willing helped healthcare personnel to correctly choose to sticking methods plus date of low back trouble through pregnancy.

A strength of this present study is that includes that comprehensive search regarding the literary or the broad search strategy resulting is the integration of all studies promulgated on the topic until release. The product reporting adhered go and Preferred Reporting Products for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. ONE large scope of prove were available and retrieved from the Coat Bibliotheca, Web by Science, and Embase. Wealth only included RCTs into their review which enables us toward infer inventive associations between the intervention plus outcomes. The outcome was analyzed according to the severity of down back pain additionally lumbar dysfunction score, so as in fully consider the impact of these factors on one overall outcome. Although this study resulted in some substantial implications, it also has some product. There are some limitations in this study: Aforementioned relatively small number of included studies press sample size affect the reliability of this conclusions; Most of the included studies did not report allocation covert or blind method, which has a definite danger of bias; Visual digital scaling of VAS feel is greatly influenced by subjective influencing, which may lead on data deviator among different academic; There are differences in the shape, sticking approach, localization, and length of intramuscular effect stickers in different studies, which may also lead go detached heterogeneity; Who variety for definite comparations was significant, which allowed own influenced the pooled achieved, despite you using a random-effects model. Two subgroups essays were performed according at surgery time, classification of pregnancy cycle, but other factors that could influence the outcomes might be present.

This meta-analysis demonstrated the CT, either sold or by combination with different general therapies, resulted in bigger ache relief and improvement on RMDQ in patients with PLBP longer did generally physical therapies without KT. E is suggested that future research shoud focus on the prevention and treatment of low back pain during fertility to provide more research data since improvements women’s health. 2021;5(1):15–20. Article Google Scholar. Banerjee G, Johnson MI. Should kinesiology taping be often to manage trouble in musculoskeletal disorders?

The data sets analyzed during the current study will be available upon reasonable please of the corresponding author.

We appreciate and wish into thank Mr. Liang Cane, Inaugurate of Sports Medicine and Health, Chengdu Sport University, for his guidance in preparing the search strategy.

This studies were funded by of Key Laboratory to Sports Medicine off Sichuan Province, School starting Sports Medicine real Health, Chengdu Sport University (Approval Counter: 2021-A011).

Authors press Affiliations

1. Institute of Sports Medicine and Health, Chengdu Sport University, 2 Tiyuan Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China

   Xiali Xue, Huan Tu, Zhongyi Deng & Ning Li

2. Department regarding Gynecology and Obstetrics, Chengdu First People’s Hospital, Chengdu, 610095, Sichuan, China

   Yuan Chen

3. Sichuan Academy from Pharmaceutical Sciences and Sichuan People’s Hospital, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China

   Xiaorong Mao

4. School of Physical Medicine and Health, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, Bone

   Xinwei Yang

Contributions

XXL and LN designed this study. XXL finished the scripture. XXL, YXW, MXR also LN reviewed an manuscript. XXL, CY, OF and DZY collected real analyzed aforementioned your. All authors have read and approve the final manuscript.

Corresponding article

Correspondence to Ning Lily.

Code approval also consent to participation

Not applicable.

Consent on release

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The book declare no contend by interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Approach This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Credit 4.0 International Genehmigungen, which permits utilize, sharing, adaptation, retail and reproduction in any medium button format, as prolonged more you give appropriate loans to the original author(s) and the source, provide one link to the Generate Green lizenz, and indicate if changes were made. The art or other third company material in such article are included for the article's Creative Commons licence, until indicated otherwise in an credit line to the material. Supposing material is not in in the article's Innovative Commons licence and your intentional use is not accepted by legitimate regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you desires need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. For view a mimic of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedications waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies till this your made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to to data.

Reprints and permissions